An enduring myth says we use only 10% of our brain, the other 90% standing idly by for spare capacity. Hucksters promised to unlock that hidden potential with methods "based on neuroscience," but all they really unlock is your wallet. Two-thirds of the public and nearly half of science teachers mistakenly believe the 10% myth. In the 1890s, William James, the father of American psychology, said, "Most of us do not meet our mental potential." James meant this as a challenge, not an indictment of scant brain usage. But the misunderstanding stuck. Also, scientists couldn't figure out for a long time the purpose of our massive frontal lobes or broad areas of the parietal lobe. Damage didn't cause motor or sensory deficits, so authorities concluded they didn't do anything. For decades, these parts were called silent areas, their function elusive. We've since learned that they underscore executive and integrative ability, without which, we would hardly be human. They are crucial to abstract reasoning, planning, weighing decisions and flexibly adapting to circumstances. The idea that 9/10 of your brain sits idly by in your skull looks silly when we calculate how the brain uses energy. Rodent and canine brains consume 5% of total body energy. Monkey brains use 10%. An adult human brain, which accounts for only 2% of the body's mass, consumes 20% of daily glucose burned. In children, that figure is 50%, and in infants, 60%. This is far more than expected for their relative brain sizes, which scale in proportion to body size. Human ones weigh 1.5 kilograms, elephant brains 5 kg, and whale brains 9 kg, yet on a per weight basis, humans pack in more neurons than any other species. This dense packing is what makes us so smart. There is a trade-off between body size and the number of neurons a primate, including us, can sustain. A 25 kg ape has to eat 8 hours a day to uphold a brain with 53 billion neurons. The invention of cooking, one and half million years ago, gave us a huge advantage. Cooked food is rendered soft and predigested outside of the body. Our guts more easily absorb its energy. Cooking frees up time and provides more energy than if we ate food stuffs raw and so we can sustain brains with 86 billion densely packed neurons. 40% more than the ape. Here's how it works. Half the calories a brain burns go towards simply keeping the structure intact by pumping sodium and potassium ions across membranes to maintain an electrical charge. To do this, the brain has to be an energy hog. It consumes an astounding 3.4 x 10^21 ATP molecules per minute, ATP being the coal of the body's furnace. The high cost of maintaining resting potentials in all 86 billion neurons means that little energy is left to propel signals down axons and across synapses, the nerve discharges that actually get things done. Even if only a tiny percentage of neurons fired in a given region at any one time, the energy burden of generating spikes over the entire brain would be unsustainable. Here's where energy efficiency comes in. Letting just a small proportion of cells signal at any one time, known as sparse coding, uses the least energy, but carries the most information. Because the small number of signals have thousands of possible paths by which to distribute themselves. A drawback of sparse coding within a huge number of neurons is its cost. Worse, if a big proportion of cells never fire, then they are superfluous and evolution should have jettisoned them long ago. The solution is to find the optimum proportion of cells that the brain can have active at once. For maximum efficiency, between 1% and 16% of cells should be active at any given moment. This is the energy limit we have to live with in order to be conscious at all. The need to conserve resources is the reason most of the brain's operations must happen outside of consciousness. It's why multitasking is a fool's errand. We simply lack the energy to do two things at once, let alone three or five. When we try, we do each task less well than if we had given it our full attention. The numbers are against us. Your brain is already smart and powerful. So powerful that it needs a lot of power to stay powerful. And so smart that it has built in an energy-efficiency plan. So don't let a fraudulent myth make you guilty about your supposedly lazy brain. Guilt would be a waste of energy. After all this, don't you realize it's dumb to waste mental energy? You have billions of power-hungry neurons to maintain. So hop to it!
一个经久不衰的迷思声称 我们只运用大脑的十分之一 剩下的百分之九十只不过是备用的存储而已 某些假行家声称可以用“基于神经科学”的方法 来开发那90%的隐藏潜力 但他们真正打开的不过是你的钱包。 三分之二的大众 以及近半数的科学教师 误以为人只能用十分之一大脑的声明是真的。 在 19 世纪 90 年代,威廉 · 詹姆斯, 美国心理学之父 曾说,"我们大多数人是不能开发 我们全部的脑力潜能"。 詹姆斯的话意味着这是一项挑战, 而并非控诉我们大脑较少的使用率。 但这个误会一直困扰着大家。 另外,在很长一段时间里 科学家们想不出 我们脑内大量的额叶 或大面积的顶叶的用途。 并且因为额叶和顶叶的损伤并不会引起运动或感觉神经的缺失, 所以研究人员断定他们没有任何作用。 几十年来,这些部位 被称为沉默区域, 他们真正的作用令人难以琢磨。 我们既然已经知道他们重视 执行和综合能力, 所以一旦失去他们,我们几乎就失去了人类的基本能力。 他们对我们抽象推理的能力、 规划、 做决定 和是否能很快的适应环境有着至关重要的作用。 那个十分之九的大脑 在你的脑袋里袖手旁观的理论, 在我们计算大脑怎样消耗能量时显得毫无道理。 啮齿动物和犬齿动物的大脑消耗 身体总能量的 5%。 猴子使用其大脑的10%。 成人的大脑, 仅占全身质量的2%, 每日却消耗20%的葡萄糖。 而儿童消耗50%的葡萄糖, 婴儿要消耗60%。 这组数值远远超出了我们的预想, 因为他们不同的 大脑相对于整个身体的质量。 人的大脑重 1.5 公斤, 大象大脑重5 公斤, 鲸鱼大脑重9 公斤, 然而这每一公斤里面, 人类的大脑比其他物种的大脑 有更多的神经元。 我们人类正是因为紧密排列的神经元才会如此聪明。 在体重和神经元数量之间 有一个平衡点, 这就是灵长类动物(包括我们人类)可以承受的数量。 一个25公斤重的猿每天要进食8个小时, 才能使装有530亿个神经元的大脑正常运作。 烹饪的发明, 那是大约150万年前的事情, 在进化方面带给了我们巨大的优势。 煮熟的食物较为松软 且在入口前已经过预消化。 我们的内脏更容易吸收它的能量。 烹饪节省时间 并提供了更多的能量, 相比于我们吃生食物来说。 所以我们可以维持 拥有860 亿密集神经元的大脑的正常运转, 比猿大脑内的神经元数量多出40%。 这里是它的工作原理: 大脑消耗的一半卡路里 都只是简单地为了保持大脑结构的完好无损 用钠离子和钾离子 渗透过细胞膜来保持胞内电荷平衡。 要做到这一点,大脑则必须有强有力的能量。 大脑每分钟都令人震惊地消耗 3.4 x 10 ^21 个三磷酸腺苷(ATP) 分子, 三磷酸腺苷就好像支持我们身体燃烧的燃料。 在所有 860 亿神经元里面 保持(细胞的)静息电位的 高消耗, 意味着只剩下很少的一点能量 来把信号送到神经轴突和神经突触, 实际上是神经放电这个过程在真正起作用。 即使只有很少一部分的神经元 在任一时间的某一区域被发射, 在整个大脑内 因生成峰值而产生的能量负担 会使其不能长时间负荷。 因此就需要高效利用能源。 只让一小部分的细胞 在某一时间被发射出来, 这个叫做稀疏编码的过程, 仅用最少的能量, 但却能承载最多的的信息。 因为少量的信号 有成千上万种可能的路径 来到达目的地。 但稀疏编码在大量的神经元内 却有一个缺点, 那就是它的成本。 更糟糕的是,如果有大量的细胞从来没有被发射出去, 那他们都是多余的了 自然选择在很长时间以前就应该把它们摒弃了。 解决办法是要去找到 可以立刻激活大脑的 最佳数量比例的细胞。 为使效率最大化, 在任何时间 1%~16%之间的细胞应该被激活。 这是我们为了意识的清醒 必须容忍的 能量限制。 为了节省资源 是大部分大脑的运作 必须发生在意识之外的原因。 这就是为什么同时处理多项任务是很傻的差事。 我们只是单纯缺乏同时做两件事情的能量 更不用说三件事甚至五件事情了。 当我们尝试同时处理多项任务的时候,每一项任务就会 比我们全力以赴做一件事情的时候成效要差。 这些数字是反对我们同时执行多任务的。 你的大脑已经够聪明强大了。 它需要很多的能量才能 保持如此强大。 大脑是如此的聪明, 它已然建立了一个能源效率计划。 所以不要让一个骗人的谎言 让你对你 据说很懒惰的大脑感到愧疚。 罪恶感也是会浪费能源的。 经过这一切... 你难道没有意识到 浪费精力是很傻的举动吗? 你需要维持数十亿 非常消耗能量的神经元的正常工作。