There's something that I'd like you to see.
Volio bih da vidite nešto.
(Video) Reporter: It's a story that's deeply unsettled millions in China: footage of a two-year-old girl hit by a van and left bleeding in the street by passersby, footage too graphic to be shown. The entire accident is caught on camera. The driver pauses after hitting the child, his back wheels seen resting on her for over a second. Within two minutes, three people pass two-year-old Wang Yue by. The first walks around the badly injured toddler completely. Others look at her before moving off.
(Video) Reporter: Priča koja je duboko uznemirila milijune u Kini: snimka dvogodišnje djevojčice koju je udario kombi i koju su prolaznici ostavili da krvari na ulici, snimka preuznemirujuća da bi bila prikazana. Čitav incident zabilježen je kamerom. Vozač zastaje nakon što je udario dijete, vidi se kako su njegovi stražnji kotači zastali na njoj više od sekunde. U sljedeće dvije minute, troje ljudi prolazi pored dvogodišnje Wang Yue. Prvi posve zaobilazi teško ozlijeđeno dijete. Ostali bacaju pogled na nju prije nego što kreću dalje.
Peter Singer: There were other people who walked past Wang Yue, and a second van ran over her legs before a street cleaner raised the alarm. She was rushed to hospital, but it was too late. She died.
Peter Singer: Bilo je i drugih koji su prošli pored Wang Yue, i drugi kombi je prešao preko njenih nogu prije nego što je ulični čistač digao uzbunu. Brzo je otpremljena u bolnicu, no bilo je prekasno. Umrla je.
I wonder how many of you, looking at that, said to yourselves just now, "I would not have done that. I would have stopped to help." Raise your hands if that thought occurred to you.
Pitam se koliko je vas, gledajući ovo, upravo sada sebi reklo, "Ja to ne bih učinio. Ja bih se zaustavio i pomogao." Dignite ruku ukoliko vam se javila ta misao.
As I thought, that's most of you. And I believe you. I'm sure you're right. But before you give yourself too much credit, look at this. UNICEF reports that in 2011, 6.9 million children under five died from preventable, poverty-related diseases. UNICEF thinks that that's good news because the figure has been steadily coming down from 12 million in 1990. That is good. But still, 6.9 million is 19,000 children dying every day. Does it really matter that we're not walking past them in the street? Does it really matter that they're far away? I don't think it does make a morally relevant difference. The fact that they're not right in front of us, the fact, of course, that they're of a different nationality or race, none of that seems morally relevant to me. What is really important is, can we reduce that death toll? Can we save some of those 19,000 children dying every day?
Kao što sam i mislio, to je većina vas. Vjerujem vam. Siguran sam da imate pravo. No prije nego što si pripišete prevelike zasluge, pogledajte ovo. UNICEF izvještava da je u 2011.-oj 6,9 milijuna djece mlađe od pet godina umrlo od preventabilnih, uz siromaštvo vezanih bolesti. UNICEF smatra da je to dobra vijest zato što se taj broj stalno smanjuje od 12 milijuna u 1990.-oj. To je dobro. No ipak, 6,9 milijuna znači da 19 000 djece umre svaki dan. Je li zaista važno što ne prolazimo pored njih na ulici? Je li zaista važno što su daleko? Ne mislim da to čini moralno značajnu razliku. Činjenica da se ne nalaze ispred nas, činjenica, naravno, da su druge nacionalnosti ili rase, ništa od toga se meni ne čini moralno relevantnim. Ono što je nama zbilja važno jest možemo li smanjiti tu smrtnost? Možemo li spasiti neke od tih 19 000 djece koji svakodnevno umiru?
And the answer is, yes we can. Each of us spends money on things that we do not really need. You can think what your own habit is, whether it's a new car, a vacation or just something like buying bottled water when the water that comes out of the tap is perfectly safe to drink. You could take the money you're spending on those unnecessary things and give it to this organization, the Against Malaria Foundation, which would take the money you had given and use it to buy nets like this one to protect children like this one, and we know reliably that if we provide nets, they're used, and they reduce the number of children dying from malaria, just one of the many preventable diseases that are responsible for some of those 19,000 children dying every day.
A odgovor je da, možemo. Svatko od nas troši novac na stvari koje zapravo ne trebamo. Možete misliti na svoje navike, bio to novi auto, godišnji odmor ili tek nešto poput kupnje flaširane vode kad je voda iz slavine savršeno sigurna za piće. Mogli biste uzeti novac koji trošite na te nepotrebne stvari i dati ga ovoj organizaciji, Fondaciji protiv malarije, koja bi uzela novac koji ste dali i iskoristila ga za kupnju mreža poput ove kako bi zaštitila djecu poput ovoga, a pouzdano znamo da, ako osiguramo mreže, one se koriste i smanjuju broj djece koja umiru od malarije, tek jedne od mnogih preventabilnih bolesti koje su odgovorne za neke od tih 19 000 djece koji svakodnevno umiru.
Fortunately, more and more people are understanding this idea, and the result is a growing movement: effective altruism. It's important because it combines both the heart and the head. The heart, of course, you felt. You felt the empathy for that child. But it's really important to use the head as well to make sure that what you do is effective and well-directed, and not only that, but also I think reason helps us to understand that other people, wherever they are, are like us, that they can suffer as we can, that parents grieve for the deaths of their children, as we do, and that just as our lives and our well-being matter to us, it matters just as much to all of these people. So I think reason is not just some neutral tool to help you get whatever you want. It does help us to put perspective on our situation. And I think that's why many of the most significant people in effective altruism have been people who have had backgrounds in philosophy or economics or math. And that might seem surprising, because a lot of people think, "Philosophy is remote from the real world; economics, we're told, just makes us more selfish, and we know that math is for nerds." But in fact it does make a difference, and in fact there's one particular nerd who has been a particularly effective altruist because he got this.
Na sreću, sve više ljudi razumije ovu ideju, a rezultat je rastući pokret: efektivni altruizam. Važan je zato što kombinira i srce i glavu. Srce ste, naravno, osjetili. Osjetili ste empatiju prema tom djetetu. No, jako je važno koristiti i glavu, kako bi osigurali da je ono što radite efikasno i dobro usmjereno, i ne samo to, nego također mislim da nam razum pomaže da razumijemo da su drugi ljudi, gdjegod bili, poput nas, da mogu patiti kao što mi možemo, da roditelji tuguju zbog smrti njihove djece kao što to mi činimo, i da, kao što su nama važni naši životi i naše blagostanje, to je jednako tako važno svim ovim ljudima. Zato mislim da razum nije samo neki neutralni alat koji vam pomaže da dobijete štogod želite. Pomaže nam staviti našu situaciju u perspektivu. I mislim da su zato mnogi od najznačajnijih ljudi u efektivnom altruizmu bili ljudi upoznati s filozofijom, ekonomijom ili matematikom. I to može djelovati začuđujuće, jer mnogo ljudi misli, "Filozofija je udaljena od stvarnog svijeta; ekonomija nas, rečeno nam je, samo čini sebičnijima, a znamo da je matematika za štrebere." No, zapravo, to čini razliku, i zapravo postoji jedan štreber koji je bio posebno efektivan altruist jer je ovo shvatio.
This is the website of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and if you look at the words on the top right-hand side, it says, "All lives have equal value." That's the understanding, the rational understanding of our situation in the world that has led to these people being the most effective altruists in history, Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett.
Ovo je web stranica Fondacije Bill & Melinda Gates, i ukoliko pogledate riječi na gornjoj desnoj strani, piše: "Svi životi imaju jednaku vrijednost". To je razumijevanje, racionalno razumijevanje naše situacije u svijetu koja je dovela do toga da su ovi ljudi najefektivniji altruisti u povijesti, Bill i Melinda Gates i Warren Buffett.
(Applause)
(Pljesak)
No one, not Andrew Carnegie, not John D. Rockefeller, has ever given as much to charity as each one of these three, and they have used their intelligence to make sure that it is highly effective. According to one estimate, the Gates Foundation has already saved 5.8 million lives and many millions more, people, getting diseases that would have made them very sick, even if eventually they survived. Over the coming years, undoubtably the Gates Foundation is going to give a lot more, is going to save a lot more lives. Well, you might say, that's fine if you're a billionaire, you can have that kind of impact. But if I'm not, what can I do? So I'm going to look at four questions that people ask that maybe stand in the way of them giving.
Nitko, ni Andrew Carnegie, ni John D. Rockefeller, nije nikada dao toliko u dobrotvorne svrhe koliko je dao svatko od ovih troje, i oni su koristili svoju inteligenciju kako bi osigurali da to bude vrlo efikasno. Prema jednoj procjeni, Fondacija Gates je već spasila 5,8 milijuna života i mnogo milijuna ljudi od bolesti koje bi ih učinile vrlo bolesnima, čak i ako bi na kraju preživjeli. U nadolazećim godinama, Gates fondacija će nesumnjivo dati i puno više, spasit će puno više života. Pa, mogli biste reći, to je u redu ako ste milijarder, možete izvršiti toliki utjecaj. No, ako nisam, što mogu učiniti? Razmotrit ću četiri pitanja koja ljudi postavljaju, a koja možda stoje na putu između njih i davanja.
They worry how much of a difference they can make. But you don't have to be a billionaire. This is Toby Ord. He's a research fellow in philosophy at the University of Oxford. He became an effective altruist when he calculated that with the money that he was likely to earn throughout his career, an academic career, he could give enough to cure 80,000 people of blindness in developing countries and still have enough left for a perfectly adequate standard of living. So Toby founded an organization called Giving What We Can to spread this information, to unite people who want to share some of their income, and to ask people to pledge to give 10 percent of what they earn over their lifetime to fighting global poverty. Toby himself does better than that. He's pledged to live on 18,000 pounds a year -- that's less than 30,000 dollars -- and to give the rest to those organizations. And yes, Toby is married and he does have a mortgage.
Brinu se koliku razliku mogu napraviti. No, ne morate biti milijarder. Ovo je Toby Ord. On je znanstveni novak u filozofiji na sveučilištu Oxford. Postao je efektivni altruist kada je izračunao da bi s novcem kojeg će vjerojatno zaraditi tijekom svoje karijere, akademske karijere, mogao dati dovoljno da bi se 80 000 ljudi u zemljama u razvoju izliječilo od sljepoće i i dalje bi mu ostalo dovoljno za posve adekvatan životni standard. Tako je Toby osnovao organizaciju pod nazivom "Giving What We Can" kako bi proširio ovu informaciju, ujedinio ljude koji žele dati nešto od njihovog prihoda, i pitao ljude da založe 10 posto onoga što zarade tijekom života kako bi se borili protiv siromaštva u svijetu. Sam Toby daje više od toga. Obećao je živjeti s 18 000 funti godišnje -- to je manje od 30 000 dolara -- a ostalo dati ovim organizacijama. I da, Toby je oženjen i ima hipoteku.
This is a couple at a later stage of life, Charlie Bresler and Diana Schott, who, when they were young, when they met, were activists against the Vietnam War, fought for social justice, and then moved into careers, as most people do, didn't really do anything very active about those values, although they didn't abandon them. And then, as they got to the age at which many people start to think of retirement, they returned to them, and they've decided to cut back on their spending, to live modestly, and to give both money and time to helping to fight global poverty.
Ovo je par u kasnijem razdoblju života, Charlie Bresler i Diana Schott, koji su, kad su bili mladi, kad su se upoznali, bili aktivisti protiv rata u Vijetnamu, borili se za socijalnu pravdu, a onda su se počeli baviti karijerama, kao i većina ljudi, nisu ništa aktivno poduzimali vezano uz te vrijednosti, iako ih nisu napustili. I onda, kako su došli u doba kad mnogo ljudi počinje razmišljati o mirovini, vratili su im se, i odlučili su smanjiti svoje troškove, živjeti skromno, te davati i novac i vrijeme kako bi pomagali boriti se protiv siromaštva u svijetu.
Now, mentioning time might lead you to think, "Well, should I abandon my career and put all of my time into saving some of these 19,000 lives that are lost every day?" One person who's thought quite a bit about this issue of how you can have a career that will have the biggest impact for good in the world is Will Crouch. He's a graduate student in philosophy, and he's set up a website called 80,000 Hours, the number of hours he estimates most people spend on their career, to advise people on how to have the best, most effective career. But you might be surprised to know that one of the careers that he encourages people to consider, if they have the right abilities and character, is to go into banking or finance. Why? Because if you earn a lot of money, you can give away a lot of money, and if you're successful in that career, you could give enough to an aid organization so that it could employ, let's say, five aid workers in developing countries, and each one of them would probably do about as much good as you would have done. So you can quintuple the impact by leading that kind of career. Here's one young man who's taken this advice. His name is Matt Weiger. He was a student at Princeton in philosophy and math, actually won the prize for the best undergraduate philosophy thesis last year when he graduated. But he's gone into finance in New York. He's already earning enough so that he's giving a six-figure sum to effective charities and still leaving himself with enough to live on. Matt has also helped me to set up an organization that I'm working with that has the name taken from the title of a book I wrote, "The Life You Can Save," which is trying to change our culture so that more people think that if we're going to live an ethical life, it's not enough just to follow the thou-shalt-nots and not cheat, steal, maim, kill, but that if we have enough, we have to share some of that with people who have so little. And the organization draws together people of different generations, like Holly Morgan, who's an undergraduate, who's pledged to give 10 percent of the little amount that she has, and on the right, Ada Wan, who has worked directly for the poor, but has now gone to Yale to do an MBA to have more to give.
Sada kada spominjemo vrijeme, mogli biste pomisliti, "Bi li trebao napustiti svoju karijeru i uložiti sve svoje vrijeme u spašavanje nekih od ovih 19 000 života koji su svakodnevno izgubljeni?" Jedna osoba koja je dosta razmišljala o ovom problemu, kako imati karijeru koja će imati najveći utjecaj na dobro u svijetu, je Will Crouch. On je diplomski student filozofije, i kreirao je web stranicu pod nazivom "80 000 sati", broj sati za koji procjenjuje da većina ljudi troši na svoju karijeru, kako bi savjetovao ljude kako imati najbolju, najefektivniju karijeru. No, moglo bi vas iznenaditi da je jedna od karijera za koju ohrabruje ljude, ukoliko imaju odgovarajuće sposobnosti i karakter, karijera u bankarstvu ili financijama. Zašto? Jer ako zaradite puno novca, možete dati puno novca, a ako ste uspješni u toj karijeri, možete dati nekoj humanitarnoj organizaciji dovoljno za zaposliti, recimo, pet humanitarnih radnika u zemljama u razvoju, i svaki od njih bi vjerojatno učinio toliko dobra koliko biste i vi učinili. Znači, možete upeterostručiti utjecaj vodeći takvu vrstu karijere. Ovdje je jedan mladić koji je poslušao njegov savjet. Njegovo ime je Matt Weiger. Bio je student filozofije i matematike na Princetonu, osvojio je nagradu za najbolji preddiplomski završni rad iz filozofije prošle godine kad je diplomirao. No, počeo se baviti financijama u New Yorku. Već zarađuje dovoljno da daje šestoznamenkasti iznos efektivnim humanitarnim organizacijama i dalje mu ostaje dovoljno za život. Matt mi je također pomogao osnovati organizaciju s kojom radim, čije ime je uzeto iz naslova moje knjige, "Život koji možete spasiti", koja pokušava promijeniti našu kulturu tako da više ljudi misli da, ako ćemo živjeti etičnim životom, nije dovoljno samo pokoravati se zabranama i ne varati, krasti, osakaćivati, ubijati, nego, ako imamo dovoljno, moramo dijeliti nešto s onima koji imaju toliko malo. I organizacija okuplja ljude različitih generacija poput Holly Morgan, koja je preddiplomski student, koja je obećala dati 10 posto od onog malog što ima, i, na desnoj strani, Ade Wan, koja je direktno radila za siromašne, no sada je otišla na diplomski studij na Yale kako bi imala više za dati.
Many people will think, though, that charities aren't really all that effective. So let's talk about effectiveness. Toby Ord is very concerned about this, and he's calculated that some charities are hundreds or even thousands of times more effective than others, so it's very important to find the effective ones. Take, for example, providing a guide dog for a blind person. That's a good thing to do, right? Well, right, it is a good thing to do, but you have to think what else you could do with the resources. It costs about 40,000 dollars to train a guide dog and train the recipient so that the guide dog can be an effective help to a blind person. It costs somewhere between 20 and 50 dollars to cure a blind person in a developing country if they have trachoma. So you do the sums, and you get something like that. You could provide one guide dog for one blind American, or you could cure between 400 and 2,000 people of blindness. I think it's clear what's the better thing to do. But if you want to look for effective charities, this is a good website to go to. GiveWell exists to really assess the impact of charities, not just whether they're well-run, and it's screened hundreds of charities and currently is recommending only three, of which the Against Malaria Foundation is number one. So it's very tough. If you want to look for other recommendations, thelifeyoucansave.com and Giving What We Can both have a somewhat broader list, but you can find effective organizations, and not just in the area of saving lives from the poor. I'm pleased to say that there is now also a website looking at effective animal organizations. That's another cause that I've been concerned about all my life, the immense amount of suffering that humans inflict on literally tens of billions of animals every year. So if you want to look for effective organizations to reduce that suffering, you can go to Effective Animal Activism. And some effective altruists think it's very important to make sure that our species survives at all. So they're looking at ways to reduce the risk of extinction. Here's one risk of extinction that we all became aware of recently, when an asteroid passed close to our planet. Possibly research could help us not only to predict the path of asteroids that might collide with us, but actually to deflect them. So some people think that would be a good thing to give to. There's many possibilities.
Mnogi ljudi će misliti, ipak, da humanitarne organizacije nisu toliko efikasne. Pa hajdemo razgovarati o efikasnosti. Toby Ord je jako zabrinut zbog ovog, i izračunao je da su neke od organizacija stotine ili čak tisuće puta efikasnije od drugih, tako da je vrlo važno pronaći one efikasne. Uzmimo, na primjer, omogućivanje psa vodiča slijepoj osobi. To je dobra stvar za učiniti, zar ne? Pa, da, to je dobra stvar za učiniti, no morate misliti što biste još mogli učiniti s resursima. Otprilike 40 000 dolara košta treniranje psa vodiča i podučavanje osobe kako bi pas vodič mogao biti efikasna pomoć slijepoj osobi. Između 20 i 50 dolara košta liječenje slijepe osobe u zemlji u razvoju, ako ima trahom. Pa, ako izračunate, dobijete nešto ovakvo. Možete osigurati jednog psa vodiča za jednog slijepog Amerikanca, ili možete izliječiti između 400 i 2000 ljudi od sljepoće. Mislim da je jasno što je bolja stvar za učiniti. No, ako želite tražiti efikasne organizacije, ovo je dobra web-stranica za to. GiveWell postoji kako bi zaista ocijenio utjecaj humanitarnih organizacija, ne upravlja li se njima dobro, i provjerili su stotine organizacija i trenutno preporučuje samo tri, od kojih je prva Fondacija protiv malarije. Tako da je vrlo teško. Ukoliko želite druge preporuke, thelifeyoucansave.com i Giving What We Can oboje imaju nešto širu listu, no možete pronaći efikasne organizacije, i ne samo u području spašavanja života siromašnih. Drago mi je da mogu reći da sada postoji i web stranica posvećena efikasnim organizacijama za zaštitu životinja. To je druga stvar kojom sam se bavio čitavog života, ogromna količina patnje koju ljudi nanose doslovno desetinama milijardi životinja godišnje. Pa, ako želite potražiti efikasne organizacije za umanjiti tu patnju, možete otići na Effective Animal Activism. I neki od efektivnih altruista misle da je vrlo važno osigurati da naša vrsta preživi. Zato traže načine umanjivanja rizika od izumiranja. Ovdje je jedna opasnost od izumiranja koje smo svi nedavno postali svjesni, kada je asteroid prošao blizu našeg planeta. Možda bi nam istraživanja mogla pomoći ne samo predvidjeti putanje asteroida koji bi se mogli sudariti s nama, već ih i skrenuti. Neki ljudi smatraju da bi tu bilo dobro donirati. Mogućnosti su brojne.
My final question is, some people will think it's a burden to give. I don't really believe it is. I've enjoyed giving all of my life since I was a graduate student. It's been something fulfilling to me. Charlie Bresler said to me that he's not an altruist. He thinks that the life he's saving is his own. And Holly Morgan told me that she used to battle depression until she got involved with effective altruism, and now is one of the happiest people she knows. I think one of the reasons for this is that being an effective altruist helps to overcome what I call the Sisyphus problem. Here's Sisyphus as portrayed by Titian, condemned by the gods to push a huge boulder up to the top of the hill. Just as he gets there, the effort becomes too much, the boulder escapes, rolls all the way down the hill, he has to trudge back down to push it up again, and the same thing happens again and again for all eternity. Does that remind you of a consumer lifestyle, where you work hard to get money, you spend that money on consumer goods which you hope you'll enjoy using? But then the money's gone, you have to work hard to get more, spend more, and to maintain the same level of happiness, it's kind of a hedonic treadmill. You never get off, and you never really feel satisfied. Becoming an effective altruist gives you that meaning and fulfillment. It enables you to have a solid basis for self-esteem on which you can feel your life was really worth living.
Moje posljednje pitanje jest, neki ljudi će misliti da je doniranje teret. Ne vjerujem da je to tako. Uživao sam u darivanju čitav život, otkad sam bio diplomac. Bilo je to nešto što me zaista ispunjavalo. Charlie Bresler mi je rekao da on nije altruist. On misli da je život koji spašava njegov vlastit. A Holly Morgan mi je rekla da se borila s depresijom dok se nije uključila u efektivni altruizam, a sada je jedna od najsretnijih ljudi koje zna. Mislim da je jedan od razloga za to to što bivanje efektivnim altruistom pomaže prevladati ono što nazivam Sizifovim problemom. Ovdje je Sizif kako ga je prikazao Tizian, osuđen od bogova da gura veliki kamen na vrh brda. Tek što stigne tamo, napor postaje prevelik, kamen pobjegne, otkotrlja se niz brdo, on mora otpješačiti do dna kako bi ga opet pogurao uzbrdo, i ista se stvar ponavlja cijelu vječnost. Podsjeća li vas to na konzumeristički životni stil, gdje morate raditi teško da bi zaradili novac, potrošite taj novac na konzumeristička dobra za koja smatrate da ćete uživati koristeći ih? No, kada novac nestane, morate raditi teško kako bi dobili više, potrošili više i održali istu razinu sreće, to je vrsta hedonističkog kotača. Nikada ne siđete i nikada se ne osjećate zadovoljnima. Postajanje efektivnim altruizmom pruža vam taj smisao i ispunjenje. Omogućuje vam da imate čvrstu bazu za samopouzdanje na kojoj možete osjećati da je vaš život bio zbilja vrijedan življenja.
I'm going to conclude by telling you about an email that I received while I was writing this talk just a month or so ago. It's from a man named Chris Croy, who I'd never heard of. This is a picture of him showing him recovering from surgery. Why was he recovering from surgery?
Zaključit ću s jednim e-mailom kojeg sam primio dok sam pisao ovo izlaganje pred samo otprilike mjesec dana. Napisao ga je Chris Croy, čovjek za kojeg nisam nikada čuo. Ovo je slika njega kako se oporavlja poslije operacije. Zašto se oporavlja poslije operacije?
The email began, "Last Tuesday, I anonymously donated my right kidney to a stranger. That started a kidney chain which enabled four people to receive kidneys."
E-mail počinje ovako: "Prošlog utorka, anonimno sam donirao svoj desni bubreg strancu. To je pokrenulo lanac darivanja bubrega koji je omogućio da četiri ljudi primi bubrege."
There's about 100 people each year in the U.S. and more in other countries who do that. I was pleased to read it. Chris went on to say that he'd been influenced by my writings in what he did. Well, I have to admit, I'm also somewhat embarrassed by that, because I still have two kidneys. But Chris went on to say that he didn't think that what he'd done was all that amazing, because he calculated that the number of life-years that he had added to people, the extension of life, was about the same that you could achieve if you gave 5,000 dollars to the Against Malaria Foundation. And that did make me feel a little bit better, because I have given more than 5,000 dollars to the Against Malaria Foundation and to various other effective charities.
To učini otprilike 100 ljudi svake godine u SAD-u i više njih u drugim zemljama. Bilo mi je drago to pročitati. Chris je rekao da je na njegov čin utjecalo moje pisanje. Pa, moram priznati da se i malo sramim zbog toga, jer ja i dalje imam dva bubrega. No, Chris je rekao da ne misli da je to što je učinio toliko zadivljujuće, jer je izračunao da je broj godina života koje je dodao ljudima, produljenje života, je otprilike onoliko koliko možete postići ukoliko date 5000 dolara Fondaciji protiv malarije. I zbog toga sam se osjećao malo bolje, jer sam dao više od 5000 dolara Fondaciji protiv malarije i raznim drugim efektivnim organizacijama.
So if you're feeling bad because you still have two kidneys as well, there's a way for you to get off the hook.
Pa, ako se i vi osjećate loše jer još imate dva bubrega, postoji način da se tog osjećaja riješite.
Thank you.
Hvala vam.
(Applause)
(Pljesak)