June 2010. I landed for the first time in Rome, Italy. I wasn't there to sightsee. I was there to solve world hunger.
2010年6月, 我第一次来到意大利罗马。 我不是去那儿观光旅游的。 我是去解决世界饥饿问题的。
(Laughter)
(笑声)
That's right. I was a 25-year-old PhD student armed with a prototype tool developed back at my university, and I was going to help the World Food Programme fix hunger. So I strode into the headquarters building and my eyes scanned the row of UN flags, and I smiled as I thought to myself, "The engineer is here."
就是这样的。 我是一名25岁的博士生, 带着在大学研发的设备原型, 去帮助世界粮食计划署 解决饥饿问题。 所以我大步跨入总部大楼, 用眼睛扫视了那一排联合国旗帜, 我边笑边暗自想: “工程师来啦。”
(Laughter)
(笑声)
Give me your data. I'm going to optimize everything.
把你们的数据给我, 我要优化这一切。
(Laughter)
(笑声)
Tell me the food that you've purchased, tell me where it's going and when it needs to be there, and I'm going to tell you the shortest, fastest, cheapest, best set of routes to take for the food. We're going to save money, we're going to avoid delays and disruptions, and bottom line, we're going to save lives. You're welcome.
告诉我你们购买过的食物, 告诉我食物需要 何时送达何地 我就能告诉你 最短,最快,最便宜 的最佳食物运输道路。 我们就能节约资金, 我们就能避免延误和干扰, 最重要的是, 我们能挽救生命。 不用谢。
(Laughter)
(笑声)
I thought it was going to take 12 months, OK, maybe even 13. This is not quite how it panned out. Just a couple of months into the project, my French boss, he told me, "You know, Mallory, it's a good idea, but the data you need for your algorithms is not there. It's the right idea but at the wrong time, and the right idea at the wrong time is the wrong idea."
我想这大概会需要 用12个月的时间来实现, 好吧,或者是13个月。 但这并不怎么成功。 当我加入这个项目几个月之后, 我的法国老板就告诉我: “你知道的,马洛里, 这是一个好想法, 但是你的算法 需要的数据并不在这儿。 这想法的思路正确, 但是出现在了错误的时间点上 错误时间点上的所谓正确想法, 就是错误的想法。”
(Laughter)
(笑声)
Project over. I was crushed.
于是项目中止。 我非常沮丧。
When I look back now on that first summer in Rome and I see how much has changed over the past six years, it is an absolute transformation. It's a coming of age for bringing data into the humanitarian world. It's exciting. It's inspiring. But we're not there yet. And brace yourself, executives, because I'm going to be putting companies on the hot seat to step up and play the role that I know they can.
现在当我回顾 我在罗马度过的第一个夏天, 我看到了六年来发生的巨大变化, 真是绝对的大改变。 这是一个让我们将数据 带到人道主义世界的时代。 这真是令人兴奋,鼓舞人心。 但是我们还没完全做到。 请振作精神,高管们, 因为我正要把 企业放到焦点位置, 提高它们的作用并 尽其所能。
My experiences back in Rome prove using data you can save lives. OK, not that first attempt, but eventually we got there. Let me paint the picture for you. Imagine that you have to plan breakfast, lunch and dinner for 500,000 people, and you only have a certain budget to do it, say 6.5 million dollars per month. Well, what should you do? What's the best way to handle it? Should you buy rice, wheat, chickpea, oil? How much? It sounds simple. It's not. You have 30 possible foods, and you have to pick five of them. That's already over 140,000 different combinations. Then for each food that you pick, you need to decide how much you'll buy, where you're going to get it from, where you're going to store it, how long it's going to take to get there. You need to look at all of the different transportation routes as well. And that's already over 900 million options. If you considered each option for a single second, that would take you over 28 years to get through. 900 million options.
我在罗马的经历证明了 数据可以拯救生命。 好吧,并不是第一次的尝试, 但是我们最终做到了。 让我来展开这幅图景。 假设你需要为50万人准备三餐, 你的预算是固定的, 比方说每月650万美元。 好的,那你应该怎么做呢? 处理这件事的最好方法是什么呢? 你是该买大米、小麦、 鹰嘴豆还是油呢? 又要买多少呢? 这听起来很简单, 实则不然。 你有30种食物可供选择, 你需要从中选出五种。 那样就会有超过14万种 不同的食物组合。 针对你所挑选的每一种食物, 你还需要考虑购买量的问题, 考虑购买地的问题, 考虑储存地的问题, 考虑运输时间的问题。 你还需要查看 所有不同的运输线路。 这样下来就会有 超过9亿种不同的选择。 如果考虑一种选择需要1秒钟, 那你就需要28年时间 才能把它们全过一遍。 9亿种选择。
So we created a tool that allowed decisionmakers to weed through all 900 million options in just a matter of days. It turned out to be incredibly successful. In an operation in Iraq, we saved 17 percent of the costs, and this meant that you had the ability to feed an additional 80,000 people. It's all thanks to the use of data and modeling complex systems.
所以我们设计了一种工具, 使得决策者能够在短短几天之内, 就成功过滤完这9亿种选择。 事实证明,工具十分成功。 在伊拉克的一次行动中, 我们节约了原成本中17%的开销, 这就意味着你有额外 的能力再供养8万人 这一切都要归功于数据 以及对复杂系统建模的能力。
But we didn't do it alone. The unit that I worked with in Rome, they were unique. They believed in collaboration. They brought in the academic world. They brought in companies. And if we really want to make big changes in big problems like world hunger, we need everybody to the table. We need the data people from humanitarian organizations leading the way, and orchestrating just the right types of engagements with academics, with governments. And there's one group that's not being leveraged in the way that it should be. Did you guess it? Companies.
但这并不是我们独自完成的。 我在罗马工作的单位十分独特。 他们相信合作的力量。 他们引入学术界的帮助, 引入企业界的帮助。 如果我们希望能在像全球饥饿问题 等重大问题上创造奇迹, 我们需要每一个社会成员的加入。 我们需要来自人道组织的 数据人员指引道路, 将观点一致的学者们和政府 紧密连接在一起。 还有一个群体没有被充分利用。 猜到了吗?是企业。
Companies have a major role to play in fixing the big problems in our world. I've been in the private sector for two years now. I've seen what companies can do, and I've seen what companies aren't doing, and I think there's three main ways that we can fill that gap: by donating data, by donating decision scientists and by donating technology to gather new sources of data. This is data philanthropy, and it's the future of corporate social responsibility. Bonus, it also makes good business sense.
企业将在解决我们的世界 重大问题上发挥重要作用。 我已经在私人部门干了两年了。 我见识到了企业的能力, 以及他们没有充分去做的部分, 我认为主要有三种方式 去填补那些空缺: 通过贡献数据, 通过贡献决策科学家, 和通过贡献收集新数据的技术。 这是一种数据慈善事业, 是未来的企业社会责任。 当然它也有很好的商业意义。
Companies today, they collect mountains of data, so the first thing they can do is start donating that data. Some companies are already doing it. Take, for example, a major telecom company. They opened up their data in Senegal and the Ivory Coast and researchers discovered that if you look at the patterns in the pings to the cell phone towers, you can see where people are traveling. And that can tell you things like where malaria might spread, and you can make predictions with it. Or take for example an innovative satellite company. They opened up their data and donated it, and with that data you could track how droughts are impacting food production. With that you can actually trigger aid funding before a crisis can happen.
当今的企业, 收集大量的数据, 所以他们所能做的 第一件事就是贡献这些数据 一部分企业已经开始提供数据。 就以一家主流电信公司为例, 他们开放了位于 塞内加尔和科特迪瓦的数据 研究人员由此发现, 通过观察信号塔接收到 的手机信号模式图 你就能了解人们正前往何处。 通过这些数据你还能了解到 疟疾可能传播的地方, 你可以由此作出预测。 或者再举一个 创新性卫星公司的例子。 他们公开提供了他们的数据, 通过那些数据,你就能够追踪 干旱是如何影响粮食产量的。 有了这些数据,你甚至可以 在危机发生之前就启动援助资金。
This is a great start. There's important insights just locked away in company data. And yes, you need to be very careful. You need to respect privacy concerns, for example by anonymizing the data.
这是一个好的开始。 在企业们的数据中, 封存着许多重要的信息。 是的,你需要格外的小心。 你需要尊重隐私问题, 比如可以将数据匿名化。
But even if the floodgates opened up, and even if all companies donated their data to academics, to NGOs, to humanitarian organizations, it wouldn't be enough to harness that full impact of data for humanitarian goals. Why? To unlock insights in data, you need decision scientists. Decision scientists are people like me. They take the data, they clean it up, transform it and put it into a useful algorithm that's the best choice to address the business need at hand. In the world of humanitarian aid, there are very few decision scientists. Most of them work for companies. So that's the second thing that companies need to do. In addition to donating their data, they need to donate their decision scientists.
但即使放开了约束, 即使所有的公司 都将他们的数据捐献给 学术界,非政府组织 和人道主义组织, 这依然不足以充分使用数据, 实现人道主义目标。 为什么? 为了解锁数据中的重要信息, 你仍需要决策科学家。 像我一样的决策科学家。 他们得到数据,整理它, 改造它,再把数据 用于有用的算法中, 这是企业解决手头的 业务需求的最好选择。 在人道主义救援领域, 决策科学家十分短缺。 他们中的大部分都为企业工作。 所以公司需要做的第二件事, 除了贡献他们的数据以外, 他们还需要贡献决策科学家。
Now, companies will say, "Ah! Don't take our decision scientists from us. We need every spare second of their time." But there's a way. If a company was going to donate a block of a decision scientist's time, it would actually make more sense to spread out that block of time over a long period, say for example five years. This might only amount to a couple of hours per month, which a company would hardly miss, but what it enables is really important: long-term partnerships. Long-term partnerships allow you to build relationships, to get to know the data, to really understand it and to start to understand the needs and challenges that the humanitarian organization is facing. In Rome, at the World Food Programme, this took us five years to do, five years. That first three years, OK, that was just what we couldn't solve for. Then there was two years after that of refining and implementing the tool, like in the operations in Iraq and other countries. I don't think that's an unrealistic timeline when it comes to using data to make operational changes. It's an investment. It requires patience. But the types of results that can be produced are undeniable. In our case, it was the ability to feed tens of thousands more people.
然后企业就会说,“啊! 别带走我们的决策科学家。 我们每时每刻都需要他们。” 当然有解决方法。 如果说一家公司愿意贡献出 它的决策科学家的部分时间, 那我们应该把这部分贡献时间 分散到很长的周期里去使用, 比如说五年,这样更加有意义。 这样分配之后,每个月 可能就只需要几个小时, 对于一家公司来说微不足道, 但这促成的结果却意义非凡: 一种长期的合作关系。 长期的合作关系 能够促成友谊, 提供渠道去接触数据, 真正理解它们, 从而体会人道主义组织 正面对的需求与挑战。 在罗马,我们在世界粮食计划署 花费了整整五年, 五年时间。 前三年,好吧,我们用于 讨论解决不了的问题。 然后我们又花了两年时间 去更新,完善我们的工具 就像在伊拉克和 其他一些国家的行动一样。 当讨论到使用数据, 做出可操作改变时, 我认为我们提出的 时间线是十分现实的。 这是一种投资。 我们需要有耐心。 至少最终取得的 效益是不可忽视的。 对我们而言,这种效益 就是供养成千上万的人口。
So we have donating data, we have donating decision scientists, and there's actually a third way that companies can help: donating technology to capture new sources of data. You see, there's a lot of things we just don't have data on. Right now, Syrian refugees are flooding into Greece, and the UN refugee agency, they have their hands full. The current system for tracking people is paper and pencil, and what that means is that when a mother and her five children walk into the camp, headquarters is essentially blind to this moment. That's all going to change in the next few weeks, thanks to private sector collaboration. There's going to be a new system based on donated package tracking technology from the logistics company that I work for. With this new system, there will be a data trail, so you know exactly the moment when that mother and her children walk into the camp. And even more, you know if she's going to have supplies this month and the next. Information visibility drives efficiency. For companies, using technology to gather important data, it's like bread and butter. They've been doing it for years, and it's led to major operational efficiency improvements. Just try to imagine your favorite beverage company trying to plan their inventory and not knowing how many bottles were on the shelves. It's absurd. Data drives better decisions.
所以企业贡献了数据, 企业还贡献了决策科学家, 其实企业还有第三种帮忙的方式: 通过贡献收集新数据的技术。 就像你能看到的, 我们在很多地方还缺失数据。 此时此刻,叙利亚的难民 还在持续涌入希腊, 联合国难民委员会 忙的不可开交。 现行的体系是通过 笔和纸追踪人员的 这就是说, 当一位母亲领着她的五个孩子 走进难民营的时候, 总部基本上就 无视这件事的发生。 在未来几周中, 这一切都将会改变, 感谢私企的合作。 我正在工作的物流公司, 给我们提供了一种全新的 基于包裹跟踪的数据技术。 这样一个系统, 将为我们提供数据追踪, 这样当妈妈和她的孩子们 走进难民营的那一刻 你就会知道这件事。 不仅如此,你还会得知 下个月和下下个月, 她是否会有足够的物需供给。 信息的可视性驱动了效率。 对于企业来说, 使用技术去收集重要数据, 是它们的主要经济来源。 他们多年来都在从事这件事, 并带来了卓越的效率提升。 想象一下 你最喜欢的饮料公司 将要计划下一批产品清单, 却对正在货架上的 饮料数量毫不知情。 这听起来该多荒唐。 数据驱使我们做出更好的决策。
Now, if you're representing a company, and you're pragmatic and not just idealistic, you might be saying to yourself, "OK, this is all great, Mallory, but why should I want to be involved?" Well for one thing, beyond the good PR, humanitarian aid is a 24-billion-dollar sector, and there's over five billion people, maybe your next customers, that live in the developing world. Further, companies that are engaging in data philanthropy, they're finding new insights locked away in their data. Take, for example, a credit card company that's opened up a center that functions as a hub for academics, for NGOs and governments, all working together. They're looking at information in credit card swipes and using that to find insights about how households in India live, work, earn and spend. For the humanitarian world, this provides information about how you might bring people out of poverty. But for companies, it's providing insights about your customers and potential customers in India. It's a win all around. Now, for me, what I find exciting about data philanthropy -- donating data, donating decision scientists and donating technology -- it's what it means for young professionals like me who are choosing to work at companies. Studies show that the next generation of the workforce care about having their work make a bigger impact. We want to make a difference, and so through data philanthropy, companies can actually help engage and retain their decision scientists. And that's a big deal for a profession that's in high demand.
现在,假设你正代表着一家公司。 你是一个实用主义 而并非理想主义的人 你也许会对自己说: “好吧,这听起来不错,马洛里, 但是我为什么 会想要加入其中呢?” 首先,除了有好的公共关系外, 人道救援组织是一个 价值240亿的行业, 所以来自发展中国家超过50亿的人口, 他们都可能成为你的下一批用户。 另一方面,从事数据慈善业 的那些公司, 他们正在挖掘 封存在数据当中的新信息。 举个例子,一家信用卡公司 开放了一个集中场所, 作为一个中心 使学者,非政府组织和政府 能够一起工作。 他们查看信用卡中刷出的信息, 运用这些信息从而得出 在印度的家庭 是如何生活,工作, 获得收入和开销的。 对于人道主义世界来说, 这就为我们提供了 帮助人们摆脱贫困问题的方案。 但对于公司来说, 这就是向他们提供了 在印度的用户和潜在用户信息。 这是双赢的局面。 现在,对于数据慈善业—— 贡献数据,贡献决策科学家, 以及贡献技术—— 我激动不已, 对于像我一样选择在公司工作 的年轻学者而言意义非凡。 研究表明,新一代的劳动者 更加关注他们的工作是否 能对社会产生更大的影响力。 我们都想为世界做出不同, 所以通过数据慈善业, 公司更容易留得住 他们的决策科学家 特别是对于这种高需求 的职业来说尤其重要。
Data philanthropy makes good business sense, and it also can help revolutionize the humanitarian world. If we coordinated the planning and logistics across all of the major facets of a humanitarian operation, we could feed, clothe and shelter hundreds of thousands more people, and companies need to step up and play the role that I know they can in bringing about this revolution.
数据慈善业有很好的商业价值, 它同时也能够为人道主义事业 做出巨大变革。 如果我们能够把这些 策划和物流进度 运用到人道主义进程 的各种领域之中, 我们就能够给更多的人 提供食物,衣物和住所, 公司需要去加强和充分发挥 他们在这场革新当中 能够发挥的那些作用。
You've probably heard of the saying "food for thought." Well, this is literally thought for food. It finally is the right idea at the right time.
你也许听过这个短语“值得思考的食物” (英文习语,意思是:值得深思的问题) 字面意思就是思考食物。 我们终于在正确的时间 想出了正确的主意。
(Laughter)
(笑声)
Très magnifique.
多么美妙!
Thank you.
谢谢!
(Applause)
(掌声)