Throughout the history of mankind, three little words have sent poets to the blank page, philosophers to the Agora, and seekers to the oracles: "Who am I?" From the ancient Greek aphorism inscribed on the Temple of Apollo, "Know thyself," to The Who's rock anthem, "Who Are You?" philosophers, psychologists, academics, scientists, artists, theologians and politicians have all tackled the subject of identity. Their hypotheses are widely varied and lack significant consensus. These are smart, creative people, so what's so hard about coming up with the right answer? One challenge certainly lies with the complex concept of the persistence of identity. Which you is who? The person you are today? Five years ago? Who you'll be in 50 years? And when is "am"? This week? Today? This hour? This second? And which aspect of you is "I"? Are you your physical body? Your thoughts and feelings? Your actions? These murky waters of abstract logic are tricky to navigate, and so it's probably fitting that to demonstrate the complexity, the Greek historian Plutarch used the story of a ship. How are you "I"? As the tale goes, Theseus, the mythical founder King of Athens, single-handedly slayed the evil Minotaur at Crete, then returned home on a ship. To honor this heroic feat, for 1000 years Athenians painstakingly maintained his ship in the harbor, and annually reenacted his voyage. Whenever a part of the ship was worn or damaged, it was replaced with an identical piece of the same material until, at some point, no original parts remained. Plutarch noted the Ship of Theseus was an example of the philosophical paradox revolving around the persistence of identity. How can every single part of something be replaced, yet it still remains the same thing? Let's imagine there are two ships: the ship that Theseus docked in Athens, Ship A, and the ship sailed by the Athenians 1000 years later, Ship B. Very simply, our question is this: does A equal B? Some would say that for 1000 years there has been only one Ship of Theseus, and because the changes made to it happened gradually, it never at any point in time stopped being the legendary ship. Though they have absolutely no parts in common, the two ships are numerically identical, meaning one and the same, so A equals B. However, others could argue that Theseus never set foot on Ship B, and his presence on the ship is an essential qualitative property of the Ship of Theseus. It cannot survive without him. So, though the two ships are numerically identical, they are not qualitatively identical. Thus, A does not equal B. But what happens when we consider this twist? What if, as each piece of the original ship was cast off, somebody collected them all, and rebuilt the entire original ship? When it was finished, undeniably two physical ships would exist: the one that's docked in Athens, and the one in some guy's backyard. Each could lay claim to the title, "The Ship of Theseus," but only would could actually be the real thing. So which one is it, and more importantly, what does this have to do with you? Like the Ship of Theseus, you are a collection of constantly changing parts: your physical body, mind, emotions, circumstances, and even your quirks, always changing, but still in an amazing and sometimes illogical way, you stay the same, too. This is one of the reasons that the question, "Who am I?" is so complex. And in order to answer it, like so many great minds before you, you must be willing to dive into the bottomless ocean of philosophical paradox. Or maybe you could just answer, "I am a legendary hero sailing a powerful ship on an epic journey." That could work, too.
Kroz istoriju čovečanstva, tri male reči vodile su pesnike do prazne stranice, filozofe u agoru a tragače u proročišta - „ko sam ja?” Počevši od starogrčkog aforizma zapisanog na Apolonovom hramu, „Spoznaj samoga sebe”, do rok himne „Ko si ti?” grupe „Hu”, filozofi, psiholozi, akademici, naučnici, umetnici, teolozi i političari bavili su se pitanjem identiteta. Njihove hipoteze se uveliko razlikuju i nedostaje im značajan deo za konsenzus. Ovo su pametni, kreativni ljudi, pa šta je onda toliko teško oko dolaženja do pravog odgovora? Jedan izazov se sigurno nalazi u komplikovanom konceptu istrajnosti identiteta. Koji Vi je ko? Osoba koja ste danas? Ona od pre pet godina? Ona koja ćete postati za 50 godina? A kada je ,,jesam”? Ove nedelje? Danas? U toku ovog sata? Ove sekunde? Koji vaš aspekt je „ja"? Da li ste vi vaše fizičko telo? Vaše misli i osećanja? Vaše radnje? Ovim mutnim vodama apstraktne logike teško je ploviti, pa je verovatno prigodno to što je, da bi demonstrirao komplikovanost, grčki filozof Plutarh koristio priču o brodu. Kako ste to vi „ja”? Priča kaže da je Tezej, mitski osnivački kralj Atine, ubio jednom rukom zlog Minotaura na Kritu, a zatim se vratio kući brodom. U čast ovog herojskog podviga, Atinjani su brižljivo održavali njegov brod u luci tokom 1000 godina i jednom godišnje rekonstruisali njegovo putovanje. Kad god je deo broda bio istrošen ili oštećen, zamenjen je identičnim delom od istog materijala sve dok, u određenom trenutku, više nije preostalo originalnih delova. Plutarh je primetio da je Tezejev brod bio primer filozofskog paradoksa koji se okreće oko istrajnosti identiteta. Kako se može baš svaki deo nečega zameniti, a da ipak ostane ista stvar? Hajde da zamislimo da postoje dva broda. brod kojim je Tezej doplovio u luku, brod A, i brod kojim su upravljali Atinjani 1000 godina kasnije, brod B. Veoma jednostavno, naše pitanje je: da li je A jednako B? Neki bi rekli da je tokom 1000 godina postojao samo jedan Tezejev brod, a zbog toga što su se promene na njemu dešavale postepeno, nikada, ni u jednom trenutku, nije prestao da bude legendarni brod. Iako nemaju apsolutno nijedan zajednički deo, ova dva broda su numerički identična i znače jednu istu stvar, pa je A jednako B. Međutim, drugi bi mogli tvrditi da Tezej nikada nije kročio na brod B, a njegovo prisustvo na brodu je suštinska kvalitativna osobina Tezejevog broda. Ne može da preživi bez njega. Tako, iako su dva broda numerički identična, nisu i kvalitativno identična. Stoga, A nije jednako B. Šta se dešava, međutim, ako razmotrimo sledeći preokret? Šta ako bi, dok se svaki originalni deo broda odbacuje, neko sve njih skupio i ponovo izgradio celokupni originalni brod? Kada se izgradi, neosporno bi postojala dva fizička broda - jedan koji je doplovio u Atinu i onaj u dvorištu nekog momka. Svaki bi mogao da polaže pravo na naziv „Tezejev brod”, ali bi samo jedan mogao biti pravi. Dakle, koji je pravi i, što je još važnije, kakve veze ovo ima sa vama? Kao i Tezejev brod, Vi ste skup delova koji se stalno menjaju - Vaše fizičko telo, um, emocije, okolnosti, čak i vaši hirovi se stalno menjaju, ali ipak, na neki zapanjujući i ponekad nelogičan način ostajete i isti. Ovo je jedan od razloga zašto je pitanje „ko sam ja?” toliko složeno. Da bismo odgovorili na njega, kao i mnogi veliki umovi pre vas, morate biti voljni da zaronite u okean filozofskog paradoksa bez dna. Možda biste mogli i prosto da odgovorite: „Ja sam legendarni heroj koji upravlja moćnim brodom na epskom putovanju.” To bi, takođe, moglo da upali.